-

The Observer is a Student-run, daily print & online newspaper serving Notre Dame & Saint Mary's. Learn more about us.

-

news

Panel analyzes impact of Brexit decision

| Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Perhaps the most important geopolitical event of the summer happened completely outside the context of the United States’ presidential election, which has otherwise dominated news coverage. This event, dubbed Brexit, occurred on June 23, when the people of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union (EU).  

The Kellogg Institute for International Studies and the Nanovic Institute for European Studies hosted a panel Monday on Brexit, featuring four Notre Dame professors — associate professors of political science Sebastian Rosato, Emilia Justyna Powell and Andrew Gould and professor of finance Jeffrey Bergstrand.

WEB - 20130101, 2016, Brexit, Lecture, Rosie LoVoi copyRosie LoVoi

Professor of finance Jeffery Bergstrand speaks on the financial significance of the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union at a panel hosted by the Kellogg Institute for International Studies.

Rosato began the panel by discussing the importance of nationalism in contemporary European politics.

“Nationalism in Britain [shown by the Brexit vote] is just an example of the fact that nationalism is back all over Europe and because of this, the European Union’s days are numbered,” Rosato said.

Rosato said that this nationalism, coupled with a desire for increased sovereignty, prompted the British decision to leave the United Kingdom — a decision which he believes spells trouble for the EU’s long-term future.

“Dissatisfaction with the EU is at an all-time high,” Rosato said. “Nationalism and a desire for sovereignty is back and all over. The number of leaders who are talking about holding referenda or re-negotiating, which means not more union but less union, is rising.”

Powell then discussed reactions in Eastern and Central Europe to Brexit.

“The member states to the east of Germany feel very uncertain about Brexit,” Powell said. “They are blocking any deals between the European Union and Britain that would try to delimit free movement and trading access, because many of the citizens from these countries live in the United Kingdom.”

Powell said Poland especially was unhappy with Brexit.

“Poland was quite upset with Britain leaving,” he said. “This is the case because Britain was one of the biggest allies of Poland in speaking out against ‘Brussels Federalism,’” referring to where the headquarters of the EU is located in Belgium.

Bergstrand said the United Kingdom has always been somewhat independent from the rest of Europe, especially seen in its resistance to adopt the Euro. Bergstrand said he believes that this, accompanied by economic factors, helped to spurn Brexit.

According to Bergstrand, the regions which voted in favor of leaving had characteristically low per capita income, a low standard of living, low education and a predominance of people who did not have a high school education.

Bergstrand said he sees shades of what has happened in the United Kingdom in the increased populism of U.S. politics. Bergstrand said he believes that could lead to increased isolationism, which he sees as deeply troubling.

“This is one of the most respected economies in the world going down a dark path, and we’ve had this isolationism going back to the Great Depression,” Bergstrand said. “Countries went back and forth raising tariffs and caused the great recession of the 1920s and early 30s to become the Great Depression.”

Gould finished the panel by discussing why Prime Minister David Cameron decided to call the referendum, though he himself wanted the United Kingdom to remain in the EU.

Gould said the influence of the Euro-skeptic United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and internal dissent were major drivers of the Brexit vote.

“Intra-party tensions and third-party threats are a major reason for a governing party to hold a referendum, even if the party leaders do not want to change policy,” Gould said. “He called for a referendum — Cameron did — to keep his party in power. He was attempting to control internal dissent and trying to keep the Europe issue out of the 2015 election campaign.”

Cameron, who resigned in the wake of the Brexit vote, lost this fight, but the party, Gould said, succeeded as it was able to solidify its stance on Europe.

Despite Britain’s departure from the EU, Gould believes the union may still survive.

“The EU could be sustained by a more homogeneous group of 27,” Gould said. “Britain was always the exception. French and German cooperation will be the key link that holds the rest together.”

Tags: , , , ,

About Lucas Masin-Moyer

Lucas Masin-Moyer is a Sophomore at Notre Dame majoring in Political Science and American Studies, with a minor in Journalism, Ethics, and Democracy. He serves as Associate News Editor, lives in Morrissey Manor and hails from Telford, Pennsylvania.

Contact Lucas
  • Ek Paul Prengel

    Amazing are some of the views expressed here by 4 learned professors.
    The pro Brexit campaign was marked by a campaign of mostly lies assigning all kinds of evils to the EU and benefits to leaving the EU.
    The United Kingdom version of Trump, Boris Johnson was an effective leader of this campaign of lies and scare mongering, probably because he never believed that enough Brits would actually believe him.
    Cameron for year was an outspoken critic of the EU – a cheap critic at that, only when the referendum was nearing did he start to call for remaining in the EU – I imagine enough people did not believe his turn around to give the Brexit voters a majority in some parts of the United Kingdom
    And most importantly, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the London region with big majorities voted to stay in the EU, in fact their desire to stay in the EU might be strong enough to cause the break up of the “United” Kingdom.
    There are still countries clamoring to get into the EU.
    Even though nationalism is on the rise in the EU, for the most part nationalism is not a force anywhere near control.
    As the United Kingdom has entered onto a slippery slope of economic decline, the movements to leave the EU are realizing just how dangerous that could be to their respective national economies.
    The leaders of the EU will do some changes to make the EU more appealing to ordinary citizen.