The Observer is a Student-run, daily print & online newspaper serving Notre Dame & Saint Mary's. Learn more about us.



Fr. Jenkins speaks at interfaith prayer service in response to election

| Tuesday, November 15, 2016

At an interfaith prayer service Monday night promoting mutual respect after the 2016 election cycle, University president Fr. John Jenkins told Notre Dame students who are undocumented they have the full support of the University.

WEB - 20161114, 20161114, Chris Collins, Interfaith Prayer Service, O'ShagChris Collins | The Observer

“You accepted our invitation to come to Notre Dame,” he said. “You are part of our family. We will do everything we can to ensure that you complete your education, and you are supported in every way possible.”

The message of support comes at an uncertain time for people who are undocumented in the United States. President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign promise to crack down on illegal immigration included rescinding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), an executive order by President Obama that defers deportation for undocumented people who came to the U.S. as children, making it easier to work and go to school. Notre Dame has admitted undocumented students since 2014.

Several university administrations over the weekend promised to support undocumented students, and students and faculty at others advocated creating “sanctuary” campuses that protect those students from immigration action.

Monday’s prayer service was aimed broadly at bridging divides within the Notre Dame community. In addition to readings from the Bible, professor of Islamic studies Ebrahim Moosa read from the Quran. Songs were sung in English and Spanish, and administrators as well as student leaders of diverse organizations read intentions.

In the reflection, Jenkins acknowledged a gulf that the election had “revealed and perhaps deepened,” and he encouraged the community to engage in dialogue and listen to those with opposing views.

“We now have elected new leaders, and we should pray for them,” he said. “As far as we can in accord with our principles, we should cooperate with them to serve the common good. We should also pray for those holding opposing positions so that they may continue to be engaged, and that their voices may continue to be heard.”

Jenkins said the University community must remember three “pivotal principles.”

“First, we are committed to respecting the dignity and worth of every human person from conception to natural death regardless of national or ethnic group, religious tradition, gender, race, socioeconomic class, immigration status, sexual orientation or anything else,” he said. “Second, we are committed to working together to recognize what is called the common good the conditions that allow each member of this community to flourish and contribute to the flourishing of others. Third, we are committed to solidarity with all people to recognizing that the well-being of each person and particularly the most vulnerable and marginalized is a concern for every one of us.”

Jenkins closed the reflection with the story of a student who left Notre Dame because he was being harassed for being Jewish. University President Emeritus Fr. Theodore Hesburgh told the two students who had harassed him to convince him to come back or be expelled themselves. They did, and the three graduated together.

“This is Notre Dame,” Jenkins said. “Either we walk together in mutual support, or we do not walk at all. Either we are all Notre Dame, or none of us are. Let each of us respond to the challenges at this time by recommitting ourselves to respect for each member of the community, to joining in mutual support and to foster conversations that engage and enlighten rather than tear one another down.”

Tags: , , , ,

About Emily McConville

Emily McConville is a news writer and photographer for the Observer. She is a senior studying history and Italian with a minor in journalism. She is from Louisville, KY and lives off-campus.

Contact Emily
  • Gary

    Notre Dame should celebrate having pro-life, religious freedom, school choice President, Senate and Congress.

    • Dan

      Just because the government is in line with some of the views of the community of Notre Dame does not mean we should be silent on the views where we differ.

    • João Pedro Santos

      LOL. If they’re “pro-life”, why do they support the death penalty and why do they oppose affordable healthcare? If they support “religious freedom”, why do they want to ban an entire religion?

  • Gary

    Trump promised Catholics that as President he would:
    -Nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court,

    -Sign new legislation to protect religious liberty, including the First Amendment Defense Act, and

    -Support greater access to school choice — especially for children trapped in failing schools.
    In addition to specific policy proposals, Donald Trump expressed his gratitude for the contributions Catholics have made to American life.

    Furthermore, Trump pledged to defend Catholics against government actions that threaten our religious freedoms.

    We should pray that he follows through on these promises.

    In April of 2015, Hillary Clinton criticized the beliefs of traditional faith groups, asserting that these beliefs would have to be “changed” to accommodate abortion.

    “Far too many women are still denied access to reproductive health care… deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed,” she said.

    • João Pedro Santos

      “Nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court”
      So… will those justices repeal the death penalty? Will those justices declare that healthcare is a constitutional right?

      “including the First Amendment Defense Act”
      Do you even know what the First Amendment is? The First Amendment says that you can’t be arrested for saying stupid stuff (as long as you don’t harass people or incite to violence, of course). It doesn’t say that you can impose your beliefs on others. Freedom of expression doesn’t include freedom from criticism. The “First Amendment Defense Act” is indeed a First Amendment Attack Act. And Trump has shown to oppose the First Amendment by his desire to imprison political opponents and to sue journalists who say “mean stuff” about him.

      “Furthermore, Trump pledged to defend Catholics against government actions that threaten our religious freedoms.”
      Sure, he pledged to defend Catholics by being endorsed by the Catholic-hating white supremacist group also know as Ku Klux Klan.

      “Hillary Clinton criticized the beliefs of traditional faith groups”
      Once again you seem not to know what the First Amendment is. Religious beliefs can be criticized. If you can’t deal with that, maybe you should consider moving to Saudi Arabia. And no, religious beliefs don’t “trump” secularity or the law.
      Homophobia should not be tolerated under the disguise of “religious freedom”.
      Genital mutilation should not be tolerated under the disguise of “religious freedom” (in fact, it is a crime in the US).
      Terrorist attacks should not be tolerated under the disguise of “religious freedom”.

      ““Far too many women are still denied access to reproductive health care… deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed,” she said.”
      Guess what? She was right.