The Observer is a Student-run, daily print & online newspaper serving Notre Dame & Saint Mary's. Learn more about us.



Flags displayed across University campus show LGBT support

| Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Last weekend, LGBT alumni from Saint Mary’s and Notre Dame walked around campus for the GALA-ND/SMC reunion and were greeted with a show of support that many of them had not experienced when they were students at Notre Dame: Rainbow pride flags hung out of windows across campus, ranging from dorms to Geddes Hall, Nieuwland Hall of Science and Hesburgh Library.

This show of support for the LGBT community of Notre Dame was partly out of protest of the choice of Vice President Mike Pence as the 2017 Commencement speaker.

“Students and alumni came together and said ‘we’re frustrated with the invitation of Mike Pence as the Commencement speaker on many fronts certainly,” Bryan Ricketts, a fifth-year student who was involved in the flag distribution, said. “Dealing with LGBT issues dealing with funding for conversion therapy, his passage of a restrictive [law] that didn’t include a civil rights exemption when it was first written [and] at one point his professed intent to enshrine marriage between one man and one woman as a constitutional amendment.”

Pride flags hang from the windows of Nieuwland Hall. The flags, distributed by student groups, are being displayed as a sign of protest against this year's Commencement speaker, Vice President Mike Pence. Michael Yu | The Observer

Pride flags hang from the windows of Nieuwland Hall. The flags, distributed by student groups, are being displayed as a sign of protest against this year’s Commencement speaker, Vice President Mike Pence.

Last week, the student group We Stand For distributed almost 500 flags to students and faculty. Funded in part by student and alumni donations, the group bought a second round of pride flags after more alumni heard about the event on social media or read about it in  an article published April 21 and wanted to help, Ricketts said.

“[The LGBT alumni wished] there could have been this overt expression of support of LGBT students when they were here,” Ricketts said. “Now that they have the opportunity to do that and show that … there is a community in the Notre Dame family who cares very deeply about the LGBT student body population.”

Ricketts, who distributed some of the flags, said allies, as well as LGBT students and faculty, took flags to fly in support of a friend, roommate or family member back home.

Given the number of flags currently displayed on campus, as well as the existence of student organizations such as We Stand For and PRISM, it is tempting to assume that Notre Dame is and has always been extremely accepting, when in fact, PRISM was only formed four years ago, Ricketts said.

“This perception of ND as LGBT friendly has arisen in some cases so we forget that there are still large pockets of people on campus who don’t see things that way,” Ricketts said. “We’ve come a long way, certainly, but we’re still not by any means a campus that’s uniformly welcoming and inclusive towards LGBT students.”

This was made clear by some negative responses both students and faculty received for flying pride flags.

Junior Nicholas Furnari helped distribute flags out of the College Democrats office last week. Since then, five students who were told by either their rectors or hall staff to remove the flags from their windows have contacted Furnari to seek advice.

“I talked to five different students that represent three different dorms all [on] North Quad, that just happens to be where they live,” Furnari said. “Two were told by their hall staff, by their RAs, to take them down … and the rest were told by their rectors to take them out of the window.

“I don’t think it was anyone in student affairs who told them to do that. I think it was just their own personal political ideology which is upsetting because when you’re working a job with residential life, as a person with some authority, you have a responsibility to try to separate your personal beliefs from the work that you’re doing with students. Student affairs and the administrative office have always been supportive to the extent that they can be.”

Furnari told the students to do nothing, and to his knowledge, none of the flags have been removed.

“Very few places and buildings and dorms have actually taken them down, but it’s a little disappointing [that] in the face of what has been mostly viewed as good student organization that there’s been some animosity,” he said. “I feel like that’s not the appropriate response. When you see students rallying around a cause, you should let them do that because that’s their right as individual students.”

Additionally, two graduate physics students, Devin Whitten and Kaitlin Rasmussen, were recently contacted by the secretary of Nieuland Hall of Science and told to remove the pride flag that was hanging from the window of their third floor office.

“We put this flag up for Ally week and left it up during the weekend,” Rasmussen said. “I think we both got an email from someone in the main office that said ‘we got a complaint about this flag, you need to take it down.’”

The email told them that it was urgent they take the flag down, as it violated University policy. This seemed strange to the graduate students who had seen flags all over campus, Rasmussen and Whitten said.

“The department secretary had been told that someone who was not associated with our department, but apparently works on campus, was walking outside, saw the flag and was apparently offended enough that they felt like they needed to go inside and inform the office that it was against University policy to have a flag up in general,” Whitten said. “Supposedly it wasn’t a reaction to the fact that it was an LGBT flag, just flags in general, although I’m not sold on that.”

About a week after they had taken their flag down, Whitten and Rasmussen said that they noticed flags appearing in the windows of tenured faculty of Nieuland for the flag drop.

Jessica Baron, the outreach and communications coordinator for the Reilly Center for Science, Technology and Values, whose office is located in Geddes Hall, decided to participate in the flag drop as an ally to show support for a student. A few days after hanging the flag, Baron was contacted with a complaint.

“I was informed that a faculty member from theology who works on the fourth floor was personally offended by it because he thought it presumed to speak on behalf of the whole building. That didn’t seem like a compelling reason to take it down, considering our spirit of inclusion statement,” Baron said.

Baron contacted human resources to ask if she should take it down, and they told her she did not have to. Despite this, the faculty member is still calling for the flag’s removal, Baron said.

“I appreciate that I work for a private, Catholic institution and that I won’t be in agreement on social issues 100 percent of the time, but it seems to me that we’ve made great strides to make our LGBTQ community feel safe and accepted,”  Barons said.“The flag hanging from my office window has nothing to do with anyone else on our floor or with Geddes in general. It’s merely a signal that that person whose window this is supports our LGBTQ students along with the rest of the student body.

“That this is a problem is disturbing to me — a symbol of love and acceptance is offensive and misleading?”

Despite these negative responses, Ricketts, Furnari and the rest of the organizers of the flag drop have said due to the large number of pride flags around campus, it was a positive experience that they hope will become an annual tradition.

“I was happy in particular with the support we received from faculty and grad students,” Furnari said. “Beyond that, I think we have every dorm on campus with at least one flag … to be able to do that has been awesome. I think the vibe on campus is changing a little bit, but there’s still some tension. Small improvements add up to big improvements. I have definitely seen a change since I’ve been a student here. Every year seems to get better.”

Tags: , ,

About Marie Fazio

Contact Marie
  • Annette Magjuka

    I am outraged that a “complaint” or the political views of an RA or rector can generate an email that suppresses the first amendment rights of students or faculty. This is not the Notre Dame I love and support.

    • 1. Students and faculty do not have “first amendment rights” at Notre Dame. Notre Dame is a private institution, not public. Students and faculty only have those speech rights enumerated in du Lac and the faculty handbook, respectively.

      2. What does a rainbow flag support? If it is a statement about the equal dignity of persons regardless of sexual orientation, then you are correct in saying that “flags are well within Catholic doctrine.” But I hesitate to believe that this is the only statement that the flags are making— and I think that the students and faculty hanging these flags would agree. Many see the flag as an endorsement of the LGBTQ agenda, including support of “marriage equality.” This contradicts Catholic teachings about marriage as a sacred bond between a man and a woman. du Lac prohibits such an endorsement: “No organization, or member of any organization on behalf of the organization, may encourage or participate in any activity which contravenes the mission of the University or the moral teachings of the Catholic Church.” As for faculty and staff, one of the statutes of the university reads, “The essential character of the University as a Catholic institution of higher learning shall at all times be maintained, it being the stated intention and desire of the present Fellows of the University that the University shall retain in perpetuity its identity as such an institution.” Promoting agendas which are not in line with Catholic teaching contradicts this statute.

      • disqus_PBnOP0sXke

        While Notre Dame may be a private institution, they have to decide whether they’re an actual university or a homophobic echo chamber.

  • disqus_PBnOP0sXke

    People who get offended by rainbow flags are the real snowflakes.

  • Those who support the rainbow agenda of unnatural vice are offended with the definition of true marriage: 1 man + 1 woman. Flags to symbolize the normalization of sodomy don’t belong on a Catholic campus.

    • John Haley

      I think you completely missed the meaning of these flags.

    • disqus_PBnOP0sXke

      Did you get triggered, snowflake?

  • Steve

    Perhaps you should go back and read the legislation that then Governor Pence passed in Indiana.
    It was tailored to make sure that religious liberty was protected in Indiana, not to attack the rights of LGBTQ individuals. That was way overblown. Religious liberty laws would not need to be passed if militant liberals were not out to target and attack people with closely held religious beliefs. Putting florists and bakers and photographers out of business because they don’t want to participate in a ceremony that is against their beliefs is not only petty but it is malicious. It seems as if the most aggressive people in the LGBTQ community not only want others to tolerate their beliefs but they want everyone to agree with them. In a country such as ours that is not going to happen. There needs to be a way in which the rights of all individuals are protected, not just the so-called protected groups.

    • Tom Z.

      Where do you draw the line? What if I am part of a religion that does not allow to serve women? Can I just cite my religious beliefs when a woman walks into my store? What if my religion does not do business with Christians altogether? Can I cite that when I refuse them service? Do you see the problem with letting the religious people cite their religion when refusing service to a group of people?

      The above examples are absolutely considered discriminatory and we, as a country, have worked hard to ensure that businesses do NOT discriminate against any group of people regardless of the reason. Why do you think your right to practice your religion is more important than other people’s right’s to be treated fairly? As long as you don’t discriminate against a group of people, the rights of all individuals are protected. If you think otherwise, you have a very loose understanding of what it means to live in modern society and should look to move to a theocratic controlled government where your religious rights are not only protected, but enforced.

    • disqus_PBnOP0sXke

      Perhaps you aren’t able to read.