Klonsinski: The fault in our college football system
Zach Klonsinski | Thursday, August 27, 2015
We all have those moments in life when we come across something that makes us pause, makes us confused for a couple seconds. Something that’s not necessarily wrong per se, but something that’s definitely not right.
You look at this thing — whatever it is — and you just can’t help but think there’s something terribly inefficient or restrictive about it. But you also notice that in order to replace this thing, you’ll basically have to completely take it apart, rework, rethink or even start from scratch and build it over again, which will call for a lot of effort, creative thinking and money. So you have to weigh those costs with the costs of just working with this thing as it is. At a certain point though, the thing just needs to go.
Like a piece of dorm furniture held together with generous amounts of duct tape. Or whatever it is that’s on top of Donald Trump’s head.
Or our current college football system.
Even before former Northwestern quarterback Kain Colter and some of his teammates first raised the issue of unionizing in college athletics, something hasn’t seemed right with players who bring in millions of dollars to their school having little direct say in, well, anything.
On Aug. 17, the national branch of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) dismissed a unionization request by Northwestern football players. The ruling overturned that of regional NLRB director Peter Sung Ohr in March 2014, which had originally allowed players on Northwestern’s football team to form a union.
Interestingly enough though, the NLRB’s ruling didn’t focus on whether or not college athletes — particularly those in the big money sports like football and men’s basketball — were employees of the university (it actually even appeared to concede the players had a strong case on this point). The board instead said allowing private school football players to unionize would not have the effect of “promot[ing] uniformity and stability” in labor relations “due to the nature and structure of NCAA Division I Football Subdivision.”
First off, the irony of the NLRB effectively declaring — not denying or failing to deny — “college football” and “labor relations” belong in the same conversation despite the long-standing argument from universities, the NCAA and even state governments saying college athletes are not part of the labor force of their respective universities really jumps out at me.
Yet what grabs even more of my attention is how it seems most of the country’s leadership just keeps trying to add another piece of duct tape to the situation. They are scared of the uncertainty and hard work overhauling an outdated and oppressive system. So instead they hide, deny and further complicate the system.
Michigan House Bill 6074 states “a student participating in intercollegiate athletics on behalf of a public university in this state … is not a public employee entitled to representation or collective bargaining rights under this act.” That’s right. There’s literally a part of a law on the books in Michigan for the singular reason of saying student-athletes cannot be considered university employees. Ohio also included a similar resolution in a budget package.
Eventually the tape roll is going to run out, though. And it’s going to be sooner rather than later.
Colter likened the NLRB’s decision to punting the issue away from them, which seems fair to me. None of the major players in this situation besides the actual players have had the initiative to take on the work of doing something about it, either flat out denying the problem or seeking quick fixes (removing some food restraints, à la Shabazz Napier). Luckily, the former’s voices have diminished the more we’ve talked about this as a country.
It’s time for more than talk, however. The players themselves tried and they’ve found themselves at a dead end, so now this action must come from the NCAA and the universities themselves. A little pressure from the fans wouldn’t hurt either, though.
I’m not saying college athletes need to paid millions. I’m just saying we need to fix an outdated system.
We need to give them a voice.
The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.