Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Friday, Oct. 18, 2024
The Observer

Viewpoint


The Observer

Can we be done with this now?

·

I can not fully express how frustrated I am that The Observer Viewpoint has been completely overrun by the Great Non-discrimination Clause yet again. Can we just be done with it now? Please? This is worse than the annual Vagina Monologues Mud-Sling Fest. As much as I have love for my homosexual friends and neighbors, there's a hard truth that we all must face: The University isn't going to change its policy just because people complain about it. If you haven't noticed, that isn't how Notre Dame policy usually works. (Five-dollar footlongs? Still waiting on that...) My advice to people affected by this policy is simple: Encourage students to accept homosexuals as people completely equal to them, but stop trying to change the policy for now. All it's doing is fomenting conflict. I also advise anyone who wishes to change the policy to read the Papal encyclical "God is Love." You will see that as a Catholic school, Notre Dame has no obligation and really can't change its policy if it wants to remain in full unity with Catholic doctrine. If you are gay and you choose to come to a Catholic school, be prepared that the school will have Catholic ideology. I do not believe that efforts to "de-Catholicize" or shift the doctrinal compass of this University to fit a view of homosexuality that conflicts with "God is Love" will be very successful. Notre Dame does not  sell condoms on campus, it does not allow pre-marital sex among students and it refuses to formally condone homosexuality, all because it is holding fast to its Catholic nature. Let's try to have mutual respect here — respect and compassion for the students and faculty who are homosexuals, and just as much respect for the Catholic faith from which Notre Dame derives its policies.



The Observer

No Irish need apply

·

In the mid-19th century, an infamous sign could be seen in American cities: "No Irish Need Apply." It was one manifestation of hibernophobia or anti-Irish sentiment. In a predominantly English Protestant country, the Irish Catholics were looked down upon for their religion, culture and economic status. This bigotry against Catholics and the Irish continues today. Notre Dame is both Irish and Catholic. However, the academic community has seen to it that Notre Dame can not fully participate unless it gives up its strong Catholic Cultural roots. There was a time when Notre Dame wasn't even on the radar, but the football team changed that. Now even the football team is looked down upon.


The Observer

Need for diversity in the arts

·

When "Ragtime" was chosen as one of PEMCo's productions in 2007, I cringed at the thought of students picking a play with inflamed racial language and stereotypical roles during Black History Month, but remained faithful that lessons would be learned.


The Observer

Thoughts on Coloring

·

As a child, I remember choosing each crayon color with meticulous precision as I created my coloring book masterpiece. It was always a huge debate. Blue or green. Red or purple.


The Observer

Unplug your digital life support during Lent

·

As the countdown marches towards Ash Wednesday, a lonely Friday remains free for practicing Catholics to eat meat before the start of Lent. The longstanding religious ritual prepares the faithful to better focus on the sacrificial meaning of Easter by, in fact, personally sacrificing. Countless times during my youth, I watched my father build a huge ham or roast beef sandwich blanketed with pepperoni slices on Friday evenings around 11:30 p.m. — ultimately biting into his meaty delight well before the midnight deadline. He could rationalize that he hadn't eaten meat after 11 p.m. the night before, so he fulfilled his obligation of fasting for a full 24 hours. After all, God surely accepts his heart's intentions over any technical stroke of midnight. Each year Lent seems to stealthily sneak up on the calendar while we still languish in the deep frozen throws of winter. And each year Lent catches many of us unprepared to designate our personally individual sacrifices beyond the universal abstention from meat on Fridays. This year, I suggest that we — especially students on campus as well as the twenty-somethings who recently graduated and are now working in real jobs with their real-life morning commutes along side their real-life coworkers — attempt to pull the plug on our digital dependences for 40 days. Recognizing the positives of communicating with BFFs on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and other social networking venues, consider the 40-day break a retreat into the desert sand dunes or at a mountaintop monastery. Returning back to the days of personal face-to-face interactions may just be a pleasant surprise, not to mention how it will hone one's skill to actually make new friends or learn how to better speak with people of various backgrounds and experiences. For me, the perfect example existed during my commute to work while waiting at the Washington, D.C. Metro bus stop No. 1393 on 14th Street. Most mornings since I first adopted this bus route, nearly everyone — young and old, skilled worker or professional, male and female — at my bus shelter and along the nearby stops of my bus route has been wired with iPods, cellular phones or both. Some appear to have escaped from a futuristic science fiction hospital with digital intravenous lines emanating from their veins. Others have attempted to juggle two devices in the right hand while sipping coffee from the left hand. However, all of them have shut themselves off from making a new friend, hearing a compliment or engaging in an interesting conversation. For example, months ago when I first used the bus for my daily commute, I stood alongside a commuter who remarkably resembles the Scottish actor, Sean Biggerstaff. Biggerstaff is best known for playing Oliver Wood, the Gryffindor Quidditch team captain and "keeper" in the Harry Potter series who acts like a taskmaster during practice and incessantly harangues Potter to catch the Golden Snitch, even if Potter plunges off his Firebolt broom from the sky. Respecting that my neighbor was listening to his iPod while texting on his phone, I waited for another day to tell him of his resemblance to Biggerstaff. For months, we both stood together while he texted and listened to his music until one day he finally arrived without the iPod. Finally, while he intently texted, I asked, "No iPod today?" He made no reply, so I repeated the question. Turning away, he curtly answered, "No," as though I had annoyed him. It is ironic that he seemed to act exactly like his lookalike Oliver Wood character — focused almost to the extent of obsession, probably a nice person but lacking in interpersonal tact. On that day I would not discover his background or interests, political affiliation, if he attended one of Notre Dame's rival schools, whether he had a dog that could play with mine or anything about his personality and humor. For an outgoing person like me, it was a possible friendship denied. The Lenten season need not be the catalyst to curtail one's digital addictions in favor of more face-to-face personal interaction. Religion, too, need not be the excuse to adjust one's behavior merely for a limited period. Regardless of one's individual universe — the scholastic campus or real life world — every moment offers an opportunity to change a life, including your own. For one never knows when a neighbor may approach a bus stop and open a conversation by saying in an imitation Scottish brogue, "But you, Harry, are a seeker!"


The Observer

A natural orientation

·

While there is no sensible reason for Notre Dame not to include sexual orientation in its non-discrimination clause, certainly everyone can understand from where the underlying prejudice stems. Until religion gives up its monopoly on sexuality, LGBT students at a deeply religious school like Notre Dame (and LGBT persons everywhere) will not receive the respect they deserve. However, together as a university, as thoughtful, intelligent people, we can overcome this antiquated intolerance. We should not have to consider LGBT students as living an alternative lifestyle any more than those students who eat at North Dining Hall. Whether one thinks it's a choice or not, it's something that has no more potential to be right or wrong than where one eats dinner. Furthermore, someone being LGBT has no more effect on others than someone being heterosexual. While all of us know the potential consequences of sexual overindulgence and can expect all people to exercise some sort of self-discipline, the uninvolved should not concern themselves with judging a person's responsible private sexual activity. Sexuality is but another biological and psychological dimension of the human species. To declare homosexual behaviors as deviant is to deny the reality that homosexuality is no less natural than heterosexuality, just as dark skin is no less natural than light skin, blue eyes than brown, red hair than blonde. None of these characteristics has any moral value, and neither does sexuality. As such, for the University to reserve the right to discriminate based on this characteristic is unsound (not to mention wrong). Notre Dame should add sexual orientation to its non-discrimination clause once and for all. It is shameful that a community this bright has not done so already.


The Observer

In Memoriam: Ralph McInerny

·

Dr. Ralph McInerny, Notre Dame Professor of Philosophy, scholar, poet, writer, publisher, critic, family man and friend passed away this past Friday at the age of 80. Over a 55-year career at Our Lady's University, he wrote nearly 150 books, including a New York Times bestseller and a mystery series later adapted for NBC; taught thousands of students; directed more dissertations than any academic in Notre Dame's history; developed friendships in legion and managed to inspire, offend or impress just about everyone he encountered. He has been and will continue to be eulogized well by his closest friends and fellow academics. One should explore these pieces — the Internet is a good place to start — to learn more of this man imbued with "an angel's wit and singular learning." However, as he last officially taught a course at Notre Dame in the fall of 2006, his influence has thinned among the student population to whom he devoted much of his efforts. Please permit me, then, to share a bit of my own experience with this gracious man. While my interaction with him was limited, three aspects of his person stand out in memory: Ralph was inspiring, he was funny and he knew fully the joys and sorrows of life. He told me a story once about the legendary Notre Dame English Professor Frank O'Malley. "He would take some of his students over to the University Club," Ralph explained, "and would very nearly get them (and himself) drunk. Then, standing up, he would orate forcefully on the outstanding talents of these young men, on the way in which each would go on to make a difference in the world. These boys were nothing special, of course, but they stumbled home thinking they were. And, by golly, some of them did something about it." This same spirit animated Ralph. By official count, he ranks among the top 10 Professors in the United States for number of Philosophy dissertations directed. He frequently taught Directed Readings courses at the request of students in addition to his regular teaching demands. Always, the emphasis lay on the ability of the student to come to knowledge through the use of his or her own intellect properly oriented towards the Truth. As former student and now Loyola Marymount Professor Christopher Kaczor wrote recently, "He called forth the best from us by seeing it in us before we did." Ralph was also, to give the simile its literal force, funny as hell. He was concerned primarily for the Catholic Church, especially that great body of inspired truth given it by St. Thomas Aquinas. The issues to which he devoted his work were thus serious matters indeed, but always, always with an air to the humorous, "the only test of gravity," as Aristotle observed. I asked him once — in those quaint pre-Obama days — about Fr. Jenkins' decision regarding the Monologues. He jumped back without missing a beat: "He turned a pornography play into World War III and spent six months trying to solve a problem his mother could have figured out in five minutes." His life was devoted in love to his wife Connie and their seven children. The loss of his three-year-old firstborn, Michael, in 1957 and of his wife, Connie, in 2002 marked the two great tragedies of his own life. Once, after a group dinner at the Morris Inn, he asked the waitress for a box to take the rest of his meal home. "For tomorrow night," he explained. One could tell he missed his bride. Yet through it all he maintained that indefatigable joie de vivre. "Wherever the Catholic Sun doth shine / There's always laughter and good red wine," from a poem by Hilaire Belloc, were favorite lines of his. I asked him once last year about the Gospel teaching that husband and wife are not married in heaven. He faced me with a smile and responded, "We romantics know better." I had the opportunity to sit down with Professor McInerny a few times over the past couple of years. Now he reclines in memory: rounded brown tortoise shell glasses over a face punctuated by a Newport cigarette, tweed jacket with a button-down shirt, khaki pants crossed at the knee. He is no longer with us, but, as Marvin O'Connell eulogized in a masterful homily earlier this week, "We can hedge our bets that Ralph rests now in the bosom of Abraham." In paradisum, deducant te Angeli … Tom is a Senior at Notre Dame. He recommends that you read "I Alone Have Escaped to Tell You," the delightful autobiography of Ralph McInerny. He also recommends seeking out his book of poetry, "The Soul of Wit," and turning to his poem entitled "Necking." Amidst the shock and laughter, you'll have to smile. Tom can be contacted at tbounds@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 


The Observer

Thankful for Howard Zinn

·

Dear Mr. Brendan O'Reilly, Your critique of the legacy of Howard Zinn was almost as biased and selective as you claim the writings of the late historian were. You say that Zinn's ‘A People's History' constantly presents battles between the brave and courageous proletariat and that most ubiquitous of villains, the evil white male. And you're right, because that is a reoccurring theme in his book, just like it is in American history. Zinn (who is, by the way, a white male) chronicled the plight of black slaves ruled by white landowners, women fighting for suffrage against extreme male resistance and laborers striking for decent working conditions from those ‘rich, elite' business owners. Our nation has not been perfect — far from it. From the Trail of Tears to the the lynching era to the Vietnam War, huge injustices have been committed by elected officials and regular civilians. But glossing over these historical facts does not mean they didn't happen, and it doesn't allow us to take any lessons from them. Zinn's take on American history is not revisionist or dishonest — it is finally a history told from a perspective other than that of the winner's. I think that you read ‘A People's History' as a condemnation of America, and I will not disagree that Zinn takes issue with and protests many instances in our past. However, what you failed to recognize in your review are all of the stories of those who resisted and fought against injustice, bigotry and inequality. For every chapter on racial discrimination there was a Rosa Parks, and for every tale of political corruption, there were corresponding stories of politicians who inspired and were trusted and for all of these stories we should be thankful there was Howard Zinn, who didn't shy away from the ugly just like he didn't cover up the good. I hope that you will reread ‘A People's History' with a less critical eye and see what a service Zinn has done.


The Observer

Harmless hobby or Satan praise?

·

As a Catholic member of this institution, I am very surprised that The Observer prints a daily horoscope. The Catechism of the Catholic Church clearly states that all forms of divination are to be rejected: Recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to ‘unveil' the future. Consulting horoscopes, astrology and recourse to mediums all conceal a desire for power over time ... They contradict the honor, respect and loving fear that we owe to God alone? In my opinion, reading your daily horoscope can been seen as a sort of "gateway drug" into the dangerous world of fortune telling. It only takes a seemingly ‘harmless thing like this for the devil to get a toehold on you. You may think that the horoscope is just fun or amusing, but really it's a dangerous demon tool that is offensive to God. And so I beg you readers of Observer, beware! Do not tempt yourself by reading your horoscope or before long the devil will ensnare you with his demonic witchcraft!


The Observer

Son of a Pitch

·

I had not realized how far we, as an American society, had fallen until I read the responses to the question of the day on Monday, Feb. 1. Reading the responses to the question of "What infomercial product would you be?" was nothing less than disheartening and quite depressing. A mop. A weight-loss program. Sham-wow. How quickly we have all forgotten the man who could actually make Americans sit there, look at the product being pitched and say, "Wow, I could use this. No, I need this!" But wait, there's more! The epitome of products that have ever been pitched wasn't even mentioned: OxiClean! I for one, whenever I hear the word oxygen, am reminded of the awesome power that this detergent harnesses in just one scoop. It makes your whites whiter, your brights brighter! Whenever I see someone wearing a blue-collared shirt, with a full black beard and a smile that would make even my roommate smile (his nickname is Eeyore,) I remember and give thanks for having had the privilege to have seen such a visage and hear such a heart-warming "Hi" while watching TV. So here's to you, Billy Mays! Not everyone has forgotten you, and if I were an infomercial product, I would be proud to be OxiClean, with a second bucket of me distributed free if people call now.


The Observer

Prepare to be amazed

·

 During the lovely month of February in South Bend, those of us who don't have access to a condo in Florida and a way to get there can frequently find ourselves falling into a rut.  Sleep, study, eat, repeat.  Try to stay warm. Look for occasional sunlight sightings.  Those of us who live off campus would add the following to this routine: Shovel. Hack at ice. Repeat.


The Observer

A shovel-ready project

·

 Quoting Tim Ramer's letter to Voice of the People, on Sunday, Jan. 31: "Why is it that nothing is done to South Bend residents who refuse to shovel the sidewalks in front of their homes?


The Observer

Orientation a gift

·

 I found Mr. Damian's notes on "Orientation and Identity" (Feb. 3) logically inconsistent and dangerous. Mr. Damian's view that all humans have a "natural sexual orientation" to exist in monogamous heterosexual relationships is nothing more than his own normative prescription based on his views of the purpose of creation and, peculiarly, the hormone oxytocin. Mr. Damian proceeds to present having a homosexual orientation as an unnatural desire, and one that should be suppressed in order to lead a "natural" life.


The Observer

The walk-on tradition

·

 As a third generation legacy child, I was a Notre Dame fan from day one. My Grandpa and his four kids, including my mom, are all proud to call themselves alumni of Notre Dame. This University is one of the most prestigious in the world: a Catholic school that excels in every area. However, these days there are a number of prestigious universities out there. But what sets this school apart can't be measured in GPAs or trophies: it's the tradition. Tradition is why alums give so much back to the school, why the football stadium is sold out every home game (no matter how bad the season), why we join arms at the end of every game and chant the Alma Mater, and why my family and I love this University so much. It is a very powerful thing that permeates almost every inch of this beautiful campus and it's why my kids and grandkids will love this school years from now. That said, a very prominent tradition is about to be cast aside: football walk-ons.



The Observer

Reorientation

·

 In response to Christopher Damian's argument ("Orientation and identity," Feb. 3):


The Observer

Zinn's (biased) history

·

Howard Zinn's death certainly marked the passing of a man with great intellectual talent. But at risk of being accused of speaking ill of the dead, it is critical that Zinn's so-called "legacy" be clarified. It is unfortunate that he used his respected position as an academic as a bully pulpit of sorts to extol radical, revisionist views. His widely-read, iconoclastic polemic, "A People's History of the United States" is a reductionist, quasi-Marxist depiction of American history as that of the inherently venerable masses of the poor pitted against the big, bad, perpetually evil, rich, elite villains (almost always white males). Zinn committed the cardinal sin against history-writing; that is, he put theory first and facts second. "A People's History of the United States" is rife with inaccurate facts and glaring omissions in accordance with his social and political aims (Zinn does not include even a single source citation). As historian Michael Kammen wrote, "the people are entitled to have their history whole; not just those parts that will anger or embarrass them ... If that is asking for the moon, then we will cheerfully settle for balanced history." Zinn forced historical actors to comply with his own leftist heuristics, rather than attempting to understand them in the context of their respective time periods. "Persons of conscience" to whom Ms. Trionfero referred would be much better served reading "A History of the American People" by celebrated historian and Presidential Medal of Freedom Awardee Paul Johnson, a critical yet more balanced and optimistic account. But then again, if I disagree with him, I suppose I am one of those who do not qualify as "the people" in Zinn's mind. I think I would rather not.


The Observer

What matters more

·

To start, I'd like to say that I support the beliefs of those who took part in the silent protest in an attempt to get sexual orientation added to the non-discrimination clause. I fully believe it should be added. However, in response Will Haley's viewpoint entitled "Jenkins disappoints," (Feb. 1) I felt that there are two crucial flaws within your argument.